Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Political Humor from Iraq

cartoon
Say hello to my little friend. (Illustrated by Qassem H.J.)

This political cartoon is published on NYT from a newspaper artist working in Iraq. The picture corresponds with the paper 's week long look at Iraqi's feelings towards the continued (and drawn-out) presence of U.S. troops in Iraq.

I thought I'd take a break to blog about something other then the election for a moment...

Uncle Sam has never looked so patriotic.

Obama v. McCain: Web Presence 2.0

A study by the Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism takes a look at McCain and Obama's web presence. The Study found that the candidates official campaign sites are" quite advanced beyond anything" seen in any other elections. Some interesting data they recovered is quite revealing, beyond face value.

  • Obama’s site links to mainstream media news stories about his candidacy more frequently than does McCain’s, which tends to bypass the mainstream media and link in its “news” section instead to campaign-generated press releases. That has ebbed somewhat recently, as the site has begun linking to news stories about Palin.
  • The word “change”—the motto of the Obama campaign—is now less prominent on the information pages of the Obama site than on McCain’s. On the Republican’s site “change” is among the top 20 most frequently used words.
  • The Obama Web site provides far more text than McCain’s, by virtue of the extensive archive of Obama’s speeches (in August alone, 50,676 words on Obama’s Web site versus 21,021 on McCain’s). If you take speeches by both candidates out of the mix, Obama’s site still features more words than McCain’s, but they are closer.
  • The McCain campaign has fully integrated his vice presidential pick, Sarah Palin—both textually and visually—into the Web site’s home page, while the Obama home page denotes his vice presidential pick, Joe Biden, much less prominently.

Palin in 2012?


Politico's Roger Simon speculates whether Sarah Palin will win in 2012. That is of course pending McCain losing, or wining and not wanting to run for a second term.

Greg Mueller, a senior presidential aide to Pat Buchanan and Steve Forbes says he can see how
Sarah Palin as the economic populist and traditional American values candidates will be very appealing by the time we get to 2012.
Why is she thinking so far ahead of her VP Slot, the article pointedly remarks on some problems between Palin and McCain:
The discomfort between the two can be palpable. Chuck Todd, the NBC News political director, was in the room when Brian Williams interviewed Palin and McCain recently. “There was a tenseness,” Todd said later. “When you see the two of them together, the chemistry is just not there. You do wonder, is John McCain starting to blame her for things? Blaming himself? Is she blaming him?

I am guessing one and three. John McCain is blaming Palin for demonstrating her inexperience and lack of knowledge. And Palin is blaming McCain for running what she views as a bad campaign — a campaign that did not go after Barack Obama over the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and did not exploit Obama’s statement about how small-town people “cling” to guns and religion — and for never picking a clear message that had any traction with voters.

With exactly one week until the election, speculation over four years from now has already begun.....

Say It Aint So: Narratives Do Not Dominate This Week's News Stories

According to The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism, For the Week of October 20-26, talk of the likes of 'Joe the Plumber' and 'Lipstick on a Pig' were virtually absent from media coverage. Even Biden's gaffe about Obama being tested by an international crisis was all but absent from the dialogue. The report goes on to say:
Indeed, no single narrative dominated last week’s coverage. The top storyline, the fight over battleground states, accounted for 10% of the campaign newshole from Oct. 20-26, according to the Campaign Coverage Index from the Pew Research Center’s Project For Excellence in Journalism. That’s the lowest level of coverage for any leading weekly narrative since the general election campaign began in early June.



Percent of Campaign Newshole
Swing State Strategy 9.6%
Economy as an Issue 8.2
McCain v. Obama Polls 6.1
Colin Powell Endorses Obama 5.9
Campaign Fundraising 4.6
Obama Visits his Grandmother 4.1
Foreign Policy

3.8

Total Number of Campaign Stories = 649

Monday, October 27, 2008

Smear Creator Given Platform to Spread More on FOX

Politico's Michael Calderone reports on lasts Tuesdays debate on FOX where Sean Hannity and and Robert Gibbs battled over Obama's associations to 'radicals.' Gibbs fired back at Hannity for having Andy Martin on the show to slander the Dem on his anti-Obama special, "Obama & Friends: The History of Radicalism."

Well after appearing on the show NYT reporter Jim Rutenburg did some digging and his findings about Andy Martin were revealed on the front page of the paper in article entitled "The Man Behind the Whispers":
An examination of legal documents and election filings, along with interviews with his acquaintances, revealed Mr. Martin, 62, to be a man with a history of scintillating if not always factual claims. He has left a trail of animosity — some of it provoked by anti-Jewish comments — among political leaders, lawyers and judges in three states over more than 30 years.
Well as it happens to be, he is also the man who has been one of the leaders in spreading smears and lies about Obama.
Link
Politico ran an update yesterday that Fox's VP Bill Shine spoke to Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post, and is no longer defending the usage of "journalist" Andy Martin on the Hannity Special:
Shine told Kurtz. "We obviously didn't do enough research on who the guest was.
This is stunning, FOX news is apologizing and admitting they were wrong for having a fear mongering guest on....imagine if they did that more often..they would have no more guests.

Memo from the Editor: No Political Commentary Until Nov. 5th

The editor at the Minneapolis Star Tribune sent out an office Memo to staff requesting that all columnists stay away from Political Commentary until after the November 5th election. According to Media Matters, editor Nancy Barnes felt it would be best if journalists
"refrain[ed] from partisan political commentary in their columns ... at least until after the election." And that columnists would "'stand down' on the kind of column that's an overtly partisan take."

The office-wide memo came a day after newspaper columnist Katherine Kersten wrote a highly critical article about Al Franken, who is running for US Senate. Kersten's article claimed that Franken was anti-Christian, specifically anti-Catholic. This is Questionable considering Franken is Jewish, and less then 1% of the state shares his faith. In addition he has been married to a Catholic for over 30 years.

Even lower is the way Kresten tried to prove that he is anti-Catholic, by pulling bits and pieces from his decades long career as a comedian and a satirist. In fact the article itself was titled, "Vulgar mockery of Christians: Is this what we want in a U.S. senator?"

Kresten took his comedy out of context and the results were not very funny, essentially accusing him of hatred and intolerance.

What Media Matters is apt to point out is that dailies like the Star Tribune have a huge influence on the electorate, and words such as these could effect the election and the way people perceive the candidate.

Even more interesting is that in the past the paper has been accused of bias, according to Media Matters:

Like lots of major dailies, the Strib has been buffeted in recent years by staff cutbacks and accusations of a liberal bias. It seems that the effects of both are on display in the Franken/Coleman campaign.

Newsroom cutbacks make it more difficult to provide smart, in-depth election coverage. Perhaps more telling at the Strib, though, has been the long-running war conservatives have waged against the paper, led by bloggers such as Ed Morrissey, Hugh Hewitt, and those at Power Line.

Even more questionable is the ban of more editorials, according to Media Matters:

Adding to the irony (or the double standard; take your pick) was the fact that Please, people, no partisanship memo was distributed the very same day the Star Tribune printed a front-page article about GOP operative Jeff Larson, who found himself at the center of the Sarah Palin shopping spree scandal. (It was Larson's credit card that got burned up by Neiman Marcus to the tune of $75,000, courtesy of the Palin camp.)

Larson just happens to be one of the closest and most-connected Minnesota political allies of Franken's Republican opponent, Sen. Norm Coleman. But rather than present the story as an embarrassment to Coleman, the Strib's article about Larson was a valentine, complete with "Clark Kent" in the headline.

While this may have been the editor's decision to make, I think there are some questionable journalistic practices going on at this paper. How can you possibly say, no more editorials on the election, in such an important election cycle?

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Joe McCain Does Not Like Traffic

An irate Joe McCain, brother of John was very very annoyed about Traffic.
So annoyed he called 9-1-1.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Media Self-Censorship at McCain Rally


Politico's The Crypt Blog is following up on Rep. Robin Hayes (R-N.C.) remarks at a McCain rally in Concord, N.C., this past weekend:
Liberals hate real Americans that work and accomplish and achieve and believe in God.

The quote was published in the New York Observer in an article by Jason Horowitz, who said he stands firmly behind his reporting, after reports from the Hayes camp said these words were never uttered.
Well, it turns out local reporters did not reference Hayes remarks nor did the MSM, who Horowitz said arrived at the event after the Hayes statement was made.
Well, after some good ol' reporting on behalf of Politico it turns out the remarks were in fact made:
"I can guarantee that he said that," local reporter Josh Lanier, who was at the event, tells The Crypt. "I didn’t get the 100 percent exact quote but it was something along the lines of 'liberals hate America — people who work hard, achieve, love God.' That’s pretty much exactly what he said, but I didn’t get it exactly, which is why I didn’t use it."

Christopher Schuler, who also said he attended the event, sent this e-mail into the The Crypt: "I was at the arena Saturday morning in Concord and heard Rep. Hayes say it. It was around 10:30 a.m. Taken back by it at first, but the entire crowd was loving it."

We suppose that means Sara Gregory of the Daily Tar Heel gets the scoop, though she ended up not mentioning it in her write-up of the event.

Is Drudge's Influence Waning?


Earlier this year, an article from Politico announced "What nobody who follows the daily cut and thrust of American politics questions is Drudge's continuing power to drive the stories and shape the narratives that define presidential politics," Ecohing these sentiments was WashingtonPost.com's Chris Cillizza who labeled him the "single most influential source for how the presidential campaign is covered in the country."


Someone who thinks differently is Media Matter's Eric Boehlert who says Drudge has undeniably lost his influence in this part of the election cycle:

...it's obvious that since Wall Street's meltdown commenced five weeks ago, and since America's economic crisis became a tsunami of a news story that's not only dominated the media landscape, but also irrevocably altered the course of the campaign, the Drudge Report has become largely irrelevant in terms of the setting the news agenda for the White House run.

That's because a story like the unfolding credit crisis -- sober and complicated -- knocks Drudge completely out of his element of frivolous, partisan gotcha links.

Bohlert's commentary that Drudge is losing his influence is mimicking voters, who are now more concerned about issues, especially those that effect their wallet, then sex, lies and scandal. Drudge is failing to drive the dialogue because his stories now seem irrelevant to the issues facing the nation. But how long will this last?

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Green Party Candidate Talks to Al Jazeera


Al Jazeera's Riz Khan talks to Green Party presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney about third parties, race and capitalism.

McKinney, an African American female herself, speaks about the racial disparity, discriminatory practices and the social injustice gap that exists today. McKinney says "this is a story played out in city after city and no one really knows about it accept those that are living it." She goes on to say that not only has the mainstream media not addressed the issue, but neither has the democratic party.

This interview is quite insightful, its so telling that Al Jazeera picked this up, when was the last time you saw McKinney interviewed my the MSM?

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Late Night Gets It Right

Maybe its not such a bad thing that many people get there news from comic shows and late night shows. According to Media Matters, a recent example shows, "that might be a good thing."
With Obama being hounded by the Media and McCain over his ties to Bill Ayers, for the first time this year McCain was asked about his questionable and close relationship to G. Gordon Liddy, someone you rarely hear about in the media.

So who asked question no one else dared to ask....David Letterman.
According to Media Matters:
The lack of media attention to the Liddy-McCain relationship is one of the clearest double standards in recent political history....... until last night, McCain hadn't been asked a single question* about his ties to Liddy, a convicted felon who has instructed his listeners on how best to shoot law-enforcement agents. Liddy has held a fundraiser for McCain at his home and describes the Arizona senator as an "old friend"; McCain has said he is "proud" of Liddy.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Network Scramble

An article by Politico's Mike Allen highlights what media executives will do in the event that election night is an Obama blowout. People, this is serious. If there is no horserace to call, what will the media do? Actually talk about the issues, instead of pandering back and forth over who will win, who is inching ahead in what swing state, and all the other trivial things they talk about.

According to the Article:
But executives are already mulling how clearly they would want their anchors and analysts to state the obvious, since networks have been criticized for depressing turnout by calling elections while polls are still open for several more hours. But they must also decide how they are going to fill air time, since networks are planning to be on the air until 2 a.m. on the East Coast.


Very Interesting.....Rating's wise networks benefit from 2000-like voting catastrophe. They usually need the boost from election night because after the election is over what will they get viewers to turn in for? Car chases, Hurricanes or Paris Hilton?


More on ACORN

The media, including the AP are continuing to mismanage and get the facts wrong on the ACORN story. Either they do not get it, or they are choosing to ignore the facts. A new report put out by MediaMatters found that of 54 reports on ACORN ran by CNN between October 6 and 15th, they left out vital information about states where there had been voter-fraud in registration applications. Only three of these reports included details of one or the other, but never both important facts.
They failed to mention that:

1) that the statutes of most of those states require third parties registering prospective voters to submit all registration forms they receive; and 2) that actual instances of illegal votes being cast as a result of registration fraud are extremely rare.


Bad reporting by the MSM on an important topic, help propagate the lies told by politicans, allowing McCain to get the facts wrong about alleged voter-registration fraud at ACORN.

FBI Set to Probe ACORN

ACORN has become the latest Republican obsession over the past couple of weeks, as was evinced by John McCain's attack of it during Wednesday night's debate only . It is no suprise that the GOP feels alarm towards any voter registtration group at a time where they are losing countless voters to the Democratic party, who has registered an unprecedented amount of voters.

The AP has sources that are 'leaking' that the FBI has begun an investigation into voter-registration fraud at ACORN only weeks before the election.
Fromer US Attorney David Iglesias, spoke to TPM, and said he is shocked by this AP article saying:

"Based on what I saw in 2004 and 2006, it's a scare tactic." In 2006, Iglesias was fired as U.S. attorney thanks partly to his reluctance to pursue voter-fraud cases as aggressively as DOJ wanted -- one of several U.S. attorneys fired for inappropriate political reasons, according to a recently released report by DOJ's Office of the Inspector General

Thursday, October 16, 2008

The Final Debate

After watching the final Presidential debate last night, my blood was boiling. Several times I wanted to jump out of my seat, and go over to Hofstra University which is only 5 miles from my house, and call both presidential candidates bluffs. Covering the prolific election season endlessly through reading the paper to watching more TV news then I would like to admit, I am exhausted, frusturated, sick of the lies, the blase media coverage and lack of anything substantial being said.

I am feeling jaded perhaps. I could not even watch any media election coverage or commentary afterwards, I knew what I thought of the debate and I did not want to be told what to think or how to think.

This morning I of course could not escape the browsing over op-ed opinions, which I would rahter not quote because they all basically read the same.

I am feeling election burn-out and need to vent. I just filled out my absentee ballot...and I am happy to cast my vote and be done with. I wish that everyone could feel the relief I am feeling now. Now that my ballot is cast, I am no longer hanging on the words of the candidates and their spin and all the pundits out there. The only day left for me is election day.....

I say this now....I am sure I will be back to covering all the media and political banter within 24 hours...but for now I feel some peace.

Thursday, October 9, 2008

Worst Debate Ever....?

While I have not seen them all, I admittingly must say Tuesday nights debate was pretty darn Vanilla. I have to say Politco's Harris and Vandehei may have got it right today when they said:

The day after leaves behind a puzzle: How the hell did candidates
manage to be so timid and uninspiring at a time when American troops are in two
problematic wars, the world financial markets are in scary free fall and the Dow
has lost 1,400 points since Oct. 1? This is a moment history rarely sees — and
both men blew it.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Last Night's Debate


Last nights second presidential debate held at Belmont University in Tennessee, was supposed to be a different kind of debate, a town-hall style debate whose format is not supposed to lend it self well to talking points.

Unfortunately, to anyone who has been following this election, it is evident that the talking points of both candidates were as evident as ever. Both McCain and Obama answered questions in the manner they liked irregardless of the question, each time falling back on the same talking points that have become central to their campaigns. It is not fair to say the debate was boring, rather it was tired, there were no revelations, no moments of truth and clarification from either side.

While Elbows were thrown, particularly about the others associations with the now disgraced Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, both candidates kept the debate relatively bloodless, neither bringing up William Ayers or Charles Keating.

The real star of the debate was of course the economy, absorbing over 60minutes have questioning and answers leaving ownly a paltry 30 minutes to foreign affairs and other domestic issues, which in turn kept coming back to the economy.

Now, obviously the economy is the numero uno issue on voters minds, and likewise it should be, but it is also important to address other issues afflicting this nation. I think Obama tied in the issues of the economy with another monumental issues eloquently when he said:

Now, if we get our tax policies right so that they're good for the middle class, if we reverse the policies of the last eight years that got us into this fix in the first place, and that Senator McCain supported, then we are going to be in a position to deal with Social Security and deal with Medicare because we will have a health care plan that actually works for you, reduces spending and costs over the long term, and Social Security that is stable and solvent for all Americans and not just some.
Even FOX News in there post-election coverage asserted that, McCain lead until healthcare, the anchor said it himself.

McCain in one of his opening remarks said
Americans are angry, they’re upset, and they’re a little fearful. It’s our job to fix the problem.
But from there are on we heard very little in the way of how he would fix it.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

And the Winner is...



On MSNBC, Hardball host Christ Matthews just opened the 7pm edition of his pre-debate show in Tennessee with this:

"The democrats have won the debates 3-1, can Obama make it 3 to zil?"

Gotta love the horserace....

Speaking of "Palling Around......" McCain is Not Doing Much These Days


According to Politico's Mike Allen, there has been a lot of "grumpy McCain" going around lately, like when a Politico reporter tried asking him a question and responded"

"Excuse me, you’re bothering me," McCain said.

It was a surprising rebuke from a politician who once was famous for palling around with reporters, and who was so media-friendly that he was sometimes known as “the senator from ‘Meet the Press.’”

In another example of McCain's crabbiness Allen writes:

McCain sat down with Time magazine, a reporter asked him to define honor, and he snarled, “Read it in my books.” The magazine headlined its prickly McCain interview, “McCain’s prickly Time interview.

Other examples in the article show Politico's and other news organizations perturbed with McCains recent unfriendliness. For the MSM this is like losing a good friend. McCain has often been a darling of the media but has fallen to much criticism as of late, shutting out the media more then they would like. It is clear from this article there is a peevishness being felt in the media.

But beyond what this means to the media....what does this say about McCain.....

The article muses whether McCain's unhappy, crabbiness is the result of not running a "campaign that’s antithetical to his persona." McCain pledged to run a platform in which there would be no smears no 'politics as usual.' But as of late the campaign has become a model for 'politics as usual.' If McCain wanted to run a campaign free of smears, he can. If McCain is unhappy because he has become a slave of the conservative right and is no longer a maverick, only he can change that. By not running on platforms that he truly believes in and serving the conservative agenda, he is choosing to be just another 'grumpy old man.'

Radio Host Has Choice Words for Obama

The viral video of Sarah Palin accusing Obama of "palling around with terrorists," after she botched and distorted the NYT article she was referring to....It seems some people do not get that what she said was a complete twisting of the facts, and just another smear.

In response to Palin's comments Minneapolis Radio Host Chris Baker went off on a rant directed at Obama's response to what he obviously sees a truthful accusations asserted by Palin.

You really need to this to understand the full extent of the comments made by Minneapolis Radio Host Chris Baker.

During yesterday's broadcast Baker was discussing Palin's assertion that Obama was "palling around with terrorists," a reference to former Weather Underground member William Ayers. Bakerhe then went on to call Obama a "little bitch" who won't even stand up to a smoking-hot chick from Alaska.

As Mediamatters.org points out he obviously forgot to read or look into last weeks NYT article about Obama's relations with Ayers. In the second paragraph of the NYT article it says:

"Twenty-six years later, at a lunchtime meeting about school reform in a Chicago skyscraper, Barack Obama met Mr. Ayers, by then an education professor. Their paths have crossed sporadically since then, at a coffee Mr. Ayers hosted for Mr. Obama’s first run for office, on the schools project and a charitable board, and in casual encounters as Hyde Park neighbors."

After the publication of this article, Palin, used the article as fodder to call Obama anti-American, once again.